Reader comments
'Musical' switched for 'Sex' in Megaplex mix-up

217 comments   |   Read story

some guy | 6:20 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Didnt the girl from HSM pose for dirty pictures. And isnt that movie just one big sex tease??? I saw sex drive and the opening scene is a wet dream, lol. The parents should have known by the kinds of previews that were airing that they were not about to see a kid movie. I can't wait to have kids just so I can offer some balance to this "wimpy" world that is being created. Big deal, wrong movie aired, get your free tickets and popcorn and wait 5 minutes before the real movie plays. Your kid will prob forget anything ever happened. Something like this happened once to me when i was around 7 and we sat there for 10 mins before they changed the film...you know what was wrongly aired? couldn't tell you because it didnt matter. it only matters to idiot parents.
non American | 6:20 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
wow, had this happened anywhere in the world, other than the USA, we wouldn't have seen this article or comments. Some Americans are such terrible prudes about nakedness.

(and yes, I'm a mother of 3 and definitely a protective parent. Don't let my kids watch films with excessive violence in it, of course I wouldn't want them to actually watch porn either, but come on! a bit of moving under covers and a naked male backside, I really don't see what harm there is in that).
kitty | 6:25 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Don't previews match the movie to come? That would mean the previews wouldn't be family friendly either. Besides, I'm wondering why it took a few minutes for parents to realize this wasn't the disney flick. I'd be ticked, too, if my kids were exposed, but I think I would have realized what was going on before too much damage had been done.
Comments continue below
Whatever | 6:26 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Parents shouldn't have taken their kids to that fake teenager farce of a movie.
These comments are interesting | 6:30 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Since I live in a different state, and don't have children, I have no stake in this at at all. I like to read web comments to see social trends, and this has been interesting.

What I see is that (while I'm certain that it was accidental) when the cinema broke the law by showing an R-rated film to preadolescent children without the prior permission of the parents, and broke the implicit contract with the parents since they didn't show the G-rated film that had been paid for, many of the comment posters are blaming the PARENTS.

Why is this?
Forrest | 6:30 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
"The Rock | 9:20 a.m. Oct. 28, 2008
Just boycot the merchants of smut.

Why should decent people give their dollars to business that are polluting our culture?"

Yeah.... Like High School Musical 3!!!
Anonymous | 6:33 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
What, the human body?! Oh no! How frightening.
It's pretty sad... | 6:35 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
In some ways doesn't seem like a big deal, but look at it from the perspective of a parent that took their young daughter to see a family-oriented movie and got something else. As parents, it is our responsibility to teach these things to our kids, but not in a movie theater. But, as always, moral issues get blown out of proportion by the media because of our society's warped extreme left views. The only thing I really have to say about the situation is that I hope that the employees of the movie theater correct their mistake to prevent future happenings of this sort...Also for the parents of the children who had to see this stuff, that they can reinforce positive behavior and not dwell on the negative experience.
Justy | 6:36 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
You people bashing the parents are a bunch of freakin' morons. You do know that. This isn't some group of people protesting outside a theater of something. These are people who were minding their own business and had their afternoon ruined. These parents have every right to determine what their children should. They have every right to be upset. I bet that some of you people are the same people who bash parents for not having parenting skill. GROW UP!!
wow | 6:36 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
It is interesting to note that alot of the blame is put on the parents. Think about what you are saying...the kids go in and sit down before the movie starts and mom/dad get up to go buy the popcorn, sodas, and whatever else. Now the movie starts and the kids are sitting there getting their eyes full of this garbage!!!! What about the kids that are there with just friends to watch it with no parents present.
I would be extremely upset by this if my 5 or 8 yo saw this, but the theater did try to right the wrong and has put new policies in place to keep this from happening again.
Parents should be responsible for their kids but if you pay for something and do not get what you paid for, there is a problem.
And for the porn lovers, what if they accidently switched your "Sex Drive" movie for HSM3?????
Utah_is_a_weird_place | 6:37 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
You folks from Utah are very strange. Right now, we have children dying of starvation, freezing to death in the street, being sold as sex slaves to fat men, and being beaten to death by their parents. If you can read that sentence and still, with a straight face, tell yourself that this is such a devastating event that it warrants more than just a frank talk with your child about right and wrong - you need help. A great deal of help.

Yeah, what happened was wrong. The theater made a mistake. They took responsibility for it. But some of the damage control is up to you - that's part of what you signed up for when next to "position desired", you wrote 'parent'. They don't have mind erasing machines at the movies. (This is the part where you come in)

Be good parents. talk to your kids openly and honestly about what happened...and move on. Calling a lawyer and (this is a BIG maybe) winning some money in a lawsuit will not save/protect/purify your children. Being a good parent will.
Derek | 6:39 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
This sounds like an honest mistake which resulted from the theater trying to accommodate patrons. I find it highly unlikely this event will result in irreversible psychological trauma. Use it as opportunity to talk with your children and provide some much needed education.
Hiram | 6:41 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
-just because you perverts are immersed in pornography doesn't me our children should be subjected to it -lawsuit
Foreigner | 6:41 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Make sure you don't leave Utah for vacation. Your kids might actually get exposed to the real world.
Will | 6:43 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
But I bet the children watch Viagra and Cialis ads all weekend. Just more American hypocrisy.
Whoa | 6:43 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Re: You're not a mother...

I am a mother who has seen the devastation that meth and heroine can do to people and to families. Seeing 10 mins of "Sex Drive" is nothing compared to accidentally sticking a kid with heroine or handing him meth and a lighter.

Pornography isn't a substance and it isn't the most addictive thing we've got. What about Sugar? Wait never mind, a little Ritalin counteracts that one in children. Too bad we can�t give a pill to counteract parental ignorance.

Get off your righteous high horse... it must be nice to be so perfect and so utterly ignorant all at the same time.
Parent with sense | 6:44 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Re: You're not a mother. Correct. I am not a mother. I am a father. Nudity is NOT explicit. You do not understand the meaning of that word apparently. You are demonising nudity in the minds of your kids by treating it like something heinous. Have your kids seen you/each other/friends naked? That won't have scarred them. Your over-protective attitude will.

Moving on to the most ridiculous comment you made: Pornography is NOT, in any way, shape or form, in the same league as addictive substances. Nicotine and alcohol stats will disagree with you, to name but a few. If you believe that exposing a child to a few minutes of nudity (which is not pornography) is equal to putting a child in a drug-filled environment for a whole day then I would argue that you have some serious mental scarring yourself and should attend counselling before you pass on your damaging opinions to your kids. The human body is a natural thing and should be celebrated, not demonised. Would you take your kids to see the Venus de Milo? She's nude and regarded as a timeless masterpiece and there is no sexual context.
uuu | 6:46 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
As a member of the LDS faith, a BYU student, and semi-frequent moviegoer, It's a shame to see members of the faith so incapable of recognizing a mistake and moving on. You are whinning. The reason people outside Utah have such a dislike for Utahns and the LDS faith is because of uptight and self-righteous people like you. If you don't want to see the movie, don't go see it. If you accidently see a part of it, get out and move on. Don't drag the reputation of Church members lower because you can't live in the real world. It's embarrassing. And this talk of a lawsuit - so unfortunate that so many people are so weak as to even think that would be a good option. Weak, sheltered people.
The Grand Wazoo | 6:53 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Glad to see the Brain Police out in full force here.
Your kids are exposed to worse things in the 30 minutes before school starts every day than was seen in the first few minutes of this movie.
When did we all become so easily offended ?
I'm not sure, but we better get those bonfires stoked up just in case it happens again. . .
No one important | 6:54 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Research has shown a direct link between dysfunctional sexual activity and early exposure to nudity, sexual activity and the general free and open attitude toward sex in today's society. The parents in that theater have a right to be offended at what their kids were exposed to, also they have a right to be angry. We should not belittle them for being upset. At the same time, the damage would be very limited as long as the parents turn this even into a teaching moment about what is and is not appropriate. Exposing nudity to children is NOT appropriate.

And, about the lawsuit comments...for what? It was a mistake...teach your children well and laugh about it in a few years.
SandMan | 6:54 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
People are outraged at a theater that makes an honest mistake but don't even bat an eye when it comes to "Gay Day" or "Gender Bender Day" in our schools. How pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!
Adam | 6:55 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
When I was about 10 years old my parents dropped me off at our small town theater to see a movie but the schedule had changed because the ownership of the theater had changed. Instead of watching some Disney movie I got to watch a soft core biker sex flick. I enjoyed it.
Get over it | 6:56 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
I like how nudity = smut for you folks complaining. No wonder kids become sex-crazed teenagers because they've never been taught by their parents how to properly deal with the inevitable exposure they will get to nudity in everyday life.

The theater made a mistake. Get over it.
MIchelle | 7:00 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Something similar happened to us once. We went to see a Disney movie with out 2, 4 and 6 year old. The trailers were a little "off" for a Disney movie, and I remember thinking that it didn't feel right and was going to complain after the movie. When the movie was started it was Stigmata which opened with a very violent scene. We got out as quick as we could, and were given free tickets. I was upset and felt it was traumatizing to little kids. THere is no excuse to say that kids see this in mags and tv anyway. Many parents protect their kids from this. My then 4 and 6 year old still remember the incident almost 10 years later. Theaters should be held accountable. The corner store selling smut would be.
Parent with sense | 7:00 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Uh, John? The mention of suing came from a parent in these very same comments.

Please, let me help you down off your high horse.
jon | 7:06 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
"It's actually illegal to show sexually explicit material to children, which is why the whole rating system started in the first place. Depending on the nature of the material (I haven't seen the movie) the theater could have opened itself up to criminal prosecution."
Don't be dense. Kids can get in to see R-rated movies, so long as they are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian.

"...it can even lead to future addictions and fetishes."
What's wrong with a fetish? Lots of normal, healthy people have them.

"I've had to learn about these studies repeatedly over the course of my college education"
Oh, a college student! You must be very wise.

"Strange how pornography is more addictive than any substance in existence."
That's even funnier than the article. Does that mean people have withdrawal symptoms when coming down off porn? Seriously, that's the dumbest thing I've seen all week, and I've watched two Sarah Palin speeches!

And as for the people who suggested boycotting smut, please do. Start with theaters and move down to retailers like Target who sell the DVDs. That way, I should be able to avoid having contact with people like you.
Parent of 3 | 7:13 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
It is regrettable that it happened, but it was a MISTAKE. Get over it. If you find out that the theater manager intentionally shown the film knowing what it contained, then you have a right to make a big deal of it. Since they corrected the mistake when they were made aware of it, then cut them some slack. Put yourself in this position... if you made that mistake how would you feel, and would you want others to react. Find the problem, fix the problem.

Be a parent and explain to the kids that it was a mistake. If the parents don't make a big deal of it neither will the kids. Then again this is the lawsuit happy generation. The courts don't have enough guts to say that things have gotten out of hand and that frivalous suits should penalize the lawyer as well as the people filing it.
alex | 7:45 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
its a mistake that shouldn;t have happened & could have long range probs for the kids
Steve | 7:51 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Any parent in that theater that could not figure out the movie they were about to see was not HSM3 by looking at the previews being shown is to blame. I work projection, and if prints get moved or are sharing theatres, this can happen. I've known people to start by mistake an R-rated film instead of a kids movie, but the parents were smart enough to figure it out during the FIRST preview. The parents in the case are a bunch of moron/idiots. The projectionist made a mistake and those of you calling for a lawsuit are fools and should be ashamed of yourselves. I guess you have never made a mistake in your life.
GeorgeM | 7:52 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
The theater I go to has a manager or assistant manager watch all new movies a few days before it opens, after the theater is closed, to be sure there's nothing wrong with the film, right reels etc.
Might have been a prank to get the election off the front page.
Brian Fellow | 7:55 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
FOR SHAME! If you were a good parent, you would sit down and talk with your kids about what you just saw, rather than making a fuss over it. No one did that on purpose to upset you, just get over it and have some family time with your kids. I'm sure they forgot all about it anyway when HSM 3 came on, unless you dragged them out first.
KW-37 | 7:55 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Yes, I'm sure all those kids are now completely scarred for life. Whatever will become of them? In other news: all the complaining mothers returned home and plopped their kids down in front of late-night TV while they called their congressman to complain.
James R. Maynard III (Tron Guy) | 7:57 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
This is truely terrible. It is most likely NOT a mistake this happened. The horrible smut that children are being exposed to these days! The liberals (most likely the theatre owner and manager are liberals) are trying everything to sex-up and dumb down our children! I just can't stand for this!
Ima 15 yr old kid | 7:57 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
People are you serious? come on one mistke and you are jumping on them like hyenes to the kill.... The mistake was aviodable but with the refund AND free poopcorn AND change of procedure you should feel that they have everything in their power to not allow this mistake to happen again... just recently i took my younger sister one of the worst movies in have ever seen(HSM3) and what people said about the trailers was completely true compltely different from even just some random pg-13 garbage my friends took me too last week besides the fact do parents now not know what the disney symbol is here? i feel that if the parents feel so offended live in a cave... i hear some of the nastiest thing in my life just on my way to school, how will explain that if they can not handle a glimpse of nudity? Oh and by the way i would be thankful they gave you free movie tickets once i went to harry potter and had to wtc the hole movie upside down and got nothuin back
I was there | 8:00 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
I was there; I took my 8 year old daughter to see High school Musical 3. I would love to answer a few questions that everyone seems to have.
The trailers did seem to be not of the same content that a Disney movie would have, but the seemed to have children actors in them and I assumed that they were trying to hit a high school aged audience which all of these films seemed to hit. No once did it say that the previews were R or anything. So the preview began me to wonder but never having heard of such an accident I did not necessarily run out of the theaters at that time.
Then the showed started with no credits and it appeared to me that it was another preview and if it was not it started with a high school student IM a girl that he was a football player. Then it went wrong and at that point I took my 8 year old out of the movie. It portrayed this high school student having a girl perform sex acts on him then turned to masturbation and then the title started and the credits thereafter.
Anonymous | 8:01 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
hahAHA ha! Boobies!
Cornhusker Father | 8:05 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
There is no excuse for exposing a minor to "R-rated" movie material, whether that material be nudity, profanity, or gore and violence. This theatre is legally liable for this unfortunate incident; all it takes is for one parent to contact the local District Attorney, as well as a local, private attorney to get the ball rolling. Based on my very limited knowledge of how our legal system works (although this varies based on jurisdiction), the patrons of this theatre who were exposed to the R-rated movie could possibly have criminal (because of minors being exposed to R-rated material without the parents' consent), as well as a civil case (basically for the same reason as the criminal case, but in this case involving potential psychological damage to the minors involved, with a possible outcome being a settlement of some sort).

I don't condone abusing the courts with frivolous lawsuits, but if this had happened to me, I would absolutely pursue legal channels, if anything, to make sure laws haven't been violated; that's what our court system is here for...to protect us fromt he negligence and potentially intentional harm by others. Good day all----it's about time we stop accepting things like this.
I was there cont. . . | 8:05 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
I was absolutely upset with management not necessarily that my daughter saw nudity because I agree with most of you it is everywhere and I can not stop her from seeing it so any situation with nudity could be a valid teaching point about it. But this is just not nudity it is sex acts my daughter had a handful of questions for me like, what are they doing? what is going on? why is he making those sounds? And she even read the title of the movie and then asked me what is Sex?
The Zoo | 8:06 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Why doesn't everyone just sue everyone for everything. I mean, there's no such thing as an honest mistake, right? Any screw up is known to have ill-will at it's core. Heck, let's go further; make it a crime to make a mistake. There ya go! No more mistakes. Donna Reed would have nothing on us then. Utopia achieved. No more thoughts from the devil. No more troublesome questions from our children as they'll be dutifully protected form anything untoward.

Ahhhhhhh, yes.
Brian | 8:08 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
When I first read this I had to laugh...get over it already!!!
I was there cont . . . | 8:10 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Now I expected to answer all of the questions with my daughter some day but not that night not a night I expected my daughter to enjoy one of her most anticipated movie High School Musical 3. Even after the movie was over she asked the questions again, so you know this made an impression on her and she probably thought about throughout the entire movie. I am very disappointed in The district and there should be some laws preventing this mistake, they should be fined something and have to pay more than popcorn. How is it that a company can show out rite porn to children and not be fined anything?
This is news? | 8:10 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
I used to be a projectionist. Sometimes two movies share a theater, and if you're not careful, you can get mixed up. One time I was running late and I showed a bunch of kids waiting for "Over the Hedge" the first few minutes of a teen horror movie. Whoops. The kids were cool, and so were the moms. How come I didn't get in the paper?
Dr. Botkin | 8:11 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Let's hope there is a lawsuit coming. If the theater didn't have such filth in the building there wouldn't have been a problem.
Macon Hardy | 8:16 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
They should take this to the American Center for Law and Justice and sue. This was a deliberate attempt to indoctrinate folks who don't want to see trash and filth. This is why I never go to the movies anymore.
If someone showed a racist film or a film against Islam everyone would be up in arms. But they show indecent trash instead. It is time to stand up and be counted. Sue them and make an example to them.
Dave | 8:18 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
Not seeing the film, I am just going by the story and assuming that it is accurate.

I guess my grasp of language is not too great because the story said that "nudity was shown". Well I guess to some the nude body is obscene and it is Utah.

Yes it sounds like a mistake which could have been avoided but perhaps some parents should reconsider their parenting skill also. Perhaps the mere sight of God's greatest creation, without man's puritan coverings, should not condemn one to a life of lust and debauchery. Perhaps if our children would be taught the naked truth about humans and our God given sexuality, there would not be such demand for smut.

There certainly is a large difference between porn and nudity, just as there is between good judgment and over reaction. I would suggest that all involved step back and eith take a deep breath or cold shower.
LK | 8:26 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
I find it disturbing that so many think nothing of exposing young children to sexual situations. Where would they draw the line? Nowhere, they seek boundless societies where anything goes. They sure encourage the public display of sexual acts and content without limits. Perhaps they also "see nothing wrong" with having sex with children?
Kayne | 8:38 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
"These poor children. This is the worst thing that could have possibly happened to them."

Jeez, I'm glad that if these kids had ran out of the theatre and got hit by a bus it really wouldn't have been all THAT bad. The worst would have already been over!
HD | 8:55 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
People make mistakes - and it happens to us all. Mistake made, acknowledged by the staff - issued apologies and free stuff? What's next? Sue 'em, I suppose.

Give 'em a break...


Provoite | 9:00 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
thats gr8! As already stated, ANYTHING would be better than another High School musical movie! haha! thats just super...now if only we can get Obama to lose, life will be grand
Anonymous | 9:09 a.m. Oct. 29, 2008
With the way the media is now we really don't have the choice anymore of if we want to see explicit material or not. Flipping through channels, magazine racks, and countless other venues on the internet will push the limits of what we are comfortable viewing or having or children exposed to. Rather our thinking needs to be changed to how we will respond to it. If you are deeply offended by the material you need to only hold tight to your beliefs and "touch not the unclean thing".

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks

I don't like the English game of Crickett, so I don't read anything having to...

MLS Cup winners, MVPs

As soccer continues to grow in America this team and the game they played as...

I'm seeing Taylor Swift tonight at the Wembley Arena. I'm very excited. :o)

Real Champions

This is huge for Utah. Hopefully the state will do something special to...

Real Champions

David over Goliath. Substance over style. Team over individual. Never say...

Jazz Extra: Coming attractions

yeah Chuck, guys I picked up on that also. Look at the fact at least "jer"...

Israel was the victor in several DEFENSIVE wars that were waged against it by...

Jazz fans can be thankful for. . .

REAL SALT LAKE!! WHat better example for our boys to copy and follow. Why...

Real Champions

great article as usual BRAD I posted now on recent shocking sports champs,...

The only QB experiencing melt down in LES on Saturday will be winless! Max...

Advertisements