Lawyers call fund managers honest

Published: Friday, Nov. 6, 2009 9:22 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

NEW YORK — Two former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers charged with lying to investors always were honest about the risks of investing in securities linked to the volatile subprime mortgage market, a defense lawyer told a jury on Friday.

A co-worker who testified at a federal trial in Brooklyn "couldn't recall one meeting where they did not discuss the risks," attorney Susan Brune said in closing arguments.

Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin made sure investors knew that with their investment strategy there were "rewards, but there's risks, too," Brune said. "That's the deal."

Cioffi, 53, and Tannin, 47, pleaded not guilty last year to conspiracy and fraud charges — the first criminal case to hit Wall Street amid the housing market meltdown.

The eventual implosion of the defendants' hedge funds cost 300 investors $1.6 billion and started a domino effect that nearly led to the demise of Bear Stearns itself. The firm barely avoided bankruptcy in a rescue buyout by JP Morgan Chase & Co.

At trial, prosecutors showcased a series of e-mails they alleged revealed behind-the-scenes alarm at the hedge funds as their investments began to slide.

"The subprime market looks pretty damn ugly," Tannin wrote to Cioffi in April 2007. If Bear's internal reports were accurate, Tannin suggested, "I think we should close the funds now," and "the entire subprime market is toast."

Story continues below

The situation became so dire that Cioffi pulled $2 million of his own cash from the fund, but the pair still told investors that they should stay in and that the outlook was good, prosecutors said.

"The trial isn't really about hedge fund strategy," Assistant U.S. Attorney Ilene Jaroslaw said Thursday in her closing argument. "This case is about what the defendants said and what they did, and all their lies."

Cioffi's attorney, Dan Butswinkas, countered in his closing argument on Friday by accusing the government of relying on misleading, out-of-context "e-mail snippets" to try to turn his client into a scapegoat for a crash that was unpredictable and out of his control.

"We have proven that the government's case lacks credibility," he said.

Jurors were expected to begin their deliberations on Monday.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Palin on the fringe?

With her appearance on Trump's upcoming 3rd edition of Celebrity Apprentice,...

Letters: Hatch's side is evil

Or he really is the poster boy for Utah's brand of "Christian".

Uncontrolled business can cost billions. Is it progress to allow the road...

Reagan much-beloved in Utah

In college, I was a big Reagan fan, and perhaps he was needed for America to...

Letters: Health-care options

And you just listen to Orrin Hatch when he tells you what to do!

Letters: Palin on the fringe?

Sarah Palin will NEVER be President. Utahns may vote for her in droves, but...

Palin's book shows she's unqualified

Palin has not been trashed yet nearly as much as the last 2 democratic...

Oh come on--- Most of those events you lay at religion's feet is really...

Real Champions

Salt Lake has a professional soccer team? I know my daughter lost her soccer...

Palin's book shows she's unqualified

Palin just published a book, went on Oprah and can say whatever she wants on...

Advertisements