Republicans unveil their health-care alternatives

Published: Monday, Nov. 2, 2009 9:04 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

WASHINGTON — Small businesses would have an easier time banding together to offer insurance to employees. Consumers could cross state lines to buy coverage. There'd be no big government expansion.

Those are among the ideas that Republicans in the House of Representatives plan to push later this week, as lawmakers expect to begin debating how to overhaul the nation's health-care system.

One longtime favorite Republican proposal apparently will be absent: The Republican plan will contain no tax incentives for consumers who buy insurance individually, said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

"Cost," he said, was the reason for the omission.

Chances are that little or none of the Republican plan will become law, since the House has 177 Republicans and 256 Democrats and Democrats control 60 of the Senate's 100 seats.

The Republican strategy has two missions: Illustrate what the party stands for, and try to demonize and defeat Democratic initiatives.

Some analysts questioned whether the effort would work.

Story continues below

"It's hard to see how Americans worried about the cost of insurance or who goes without coverage would see this as a viable alternative to the Democratic plan. I guess its appeal is to the middle class, who may see it as a way of bargaining down costs," said Steven Smith, the director of the Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government and Public Policy at Washington University in St. Louis.

House Democrats have proposed a 1,990-page bill that includes a government-run insurance plan, or "public option," that would compete with private insurers. Savings in Medicare and a tax on the wealthy largely would pay for the legislation, which has been estimated to cost a net $894 billion over 10 years. The tax surcharge would apply to adjusted gross incomes of more than $500,000 for individuals and $1 million for joint filers.

Debate on that plan could begin late this week, with final votes late this week or early next week. The Republican plan would be offered as an alternative.

The Republican effort faces huge hurdles. There isn't yet a firm estimate of how much the entire plan would cost, nor is there a Congressional Budget Office estimate of how many people the Republican provisions would cover.

Recent comments

Oh, I see. So I disseminate my untrue allegations up to Sunday but...

Big deal | Nov. 3, 2009 at 9:41 a.m.

I like the "don't let government mess with healthcare" alternative.

Anonymous | Nov. 3, 2009 at 9:16 a.m.

In keeping with a longstanding Deseret News policy of not publishing...

deseretnews.com Moderator | Nov. 3, 2009 at 7:41 a.m.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Not to get political (this isn’t the proper thread) but people in...

Trial pending, bringing illegal to U.S.

Severe corporal punishment and deportation to a mexican jail. Let mexico...

Letters: Pushing atheist views

So then we care about God why?

Pelosi says health care deal near

If this horrible bill passes dem's are doomed in November. I wouldn't be...

Charter schools absolutely do not hand pick the students! I wish they did!...

obviously a zoobie - Boise was coming on strong at the seasons end, and if...

The rich can and will always buy a better education for their children....

Health care a human wish, not right

Ahhh, the old argument that consecration is a form of socialism. The...

Reid's wife, daughter in accident

I am no fan of Harry Reid politically but this is different. A broken back...

I find it very interesting that 9 out of 10 posters are Utah fans. Something...

Advertisements